Article
Open Access
Sustainable scenarios for Macao to expand its spatial tourism carrying capacity and to re-use heritage sites
1 St. Joseph University, Macau SAR, China
2 Macao Institute for Tourism Studies, Macao SAR, China
Abstract
Macao is small territory with high density population, with the limited heritage sites often overcrowded by tourists and residents. Casino oriented development and housing needs for a growing population can be an obstacle for heritage sites preservation and green spaces. This study explored the feasible strategies and solutions to expand spatial heritage tourism carrying capacity by identifying the potential new land resources for heritage and for tourism. It was conducted through reviewing the relevant planning and policy documents, site surveys and observations, and data application onto the site map through AutoCad computer software to estimate the potential supply of more land areas and historical venues available to the public and to tourists. Results demonstrated how Macao could expand 189 percent of new land for tourism, almost doubling the existing tourism carrying capacity. Some measures for managing the capacity were also proposed. This study also contributes to the literature by understanding how Tourism Carrying Capacity (TCC) of a destination can be expanded, to increase a city’s physical/spatial capacity and making the city more environmentally friendly and sustainable.
Keywords

Macao; sustainable tourism; dynamic approach; tourism carrying capacity; heritage tourism

Preview
References
  • [1]Becerra FS. Carrying capacity assessment for tourist destinations: Methodology for the Creation of synthetic indicators applied in a coastal area. Tour Manag 2021, 33(6):1337-1346.
  • [2]Picher A. The Venice Syndrome. Taskovski Films Ltd, 2012.
  • [3]Martin BS, Uysal M. An examination of the relationship between carrying capacity and the tourism lifecycle: management and policy implications. J Environ Manag1990, 31(4):1190.
  • [4]Mathieson A, Wall G. Tourism: economic, physical and social impacts. Harlow: Longman, 1982.
  • [5]Kurhade SY. Methodological framework for evaluation of tourism carrying capacity of eco sensitive region. Int J Innov Res Technol 2013, 2(3):781-786.
  • [6]Macao Statistics and Census Service [DSEC]. Population and Households, 2020a. https://www.dsec.gov.mo/en-US/Statistic?id=1, (Accessed 15 March 2021).
  • [7]Macao Statistics and Census Service [DSEC]. Visitors Arrival, 2020b. https://www.dsec.gov.mo/ts/#!/step2/KeyIndicator/zh-MO/243, (Accessed 15 March 2021).
  • [8]GGRAsia. Macau visits at 91 percent of pre-crisis only at 2025, 12th November 2021.
  • [9]Wan YKP, Lo WSS, Eddy-U ME. Perceived constraints and negotiation strategies by elderly tourists when visiting heritage sites. Leis Stud, 2021, DOI: 10.1080/02614367.2022.2066710.
  • [10]Wan YK. A comparison of the governance of tourism planning in the two Special Administrative Regions (SARs) of China–Hong Kong and Macao. Tour Manag 2013, 6 (6):164- 177.
  • [11]Oliveira CV, Rosario RD. Building Macao, a Legacy for the Future. Edition from the Office of the Under-Secretary of Transportation and Public Works Macao, 1999.
  • [12]Wan YKP, Pinheiro FV. Heritage brand improvement through streetscape rehabilitation: A case study of Macao, China. In Papers and proceedings of the International Conference on Destination Branding and Marketing for Regional Tourism Development, Purdue Univ Insti Tourism Studies 8-10, 12, 2005.
  • [13]Institute for Tourism Studies. Tourism Carrying Capacity of Macao (2007-2008), 2008.
  • [14]]Construction Department of Guangdong Province Department Bureau of Hong Kong S.A.R. and Secretariat for Public Works of Macao S.A.R (CDDBSTPW). Building Coordinated and Sustainable World-class Townships (Public Digest), Hong Kong SAR and Macao SAR. Guangdong: Guangdong Province Governments’ Printers, 2009.
  • [15]Li X, Wan YKP. Residents' Attitudes Toward Tourism Development in Macao: A Path Model. Tour Anal 2013, 18(4):443-455.
  • [16]Macao Institute for Tourism Studies Macao Tourism carrying Capacity Study 2020, Retrieved 11st February 2021.
  • [17]Macau Daily Times. 29 million visitors per year is not the limit. MGTO’s annual press conference,16th January 2013.
  • [18]Lein JK. Applying Expert Systems Technology to Carrying Capacity Assessment: A Demonstration Prototype. J Environ Manage 1993, 37(1):63-84.
  • [19]Mexa A, Coccossis H. Tourism carrying capacity: a theoretical overview. In The Challenge of Tourism Carrying Capacity Assessment. Ashgate: Hants, England, 2004.
  • [20]Pasko G. Carrying Capacity Assessment-An Essential Tool for Sustainable Tourism Development in Coastal Areas of Albania. Eur J Econ Stud 2016, 2(1): 164-171.
  • [21]Shelby B, Haberlein TA, Eds. Carrying Capacity in Recreation Settings. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, America, 1986.
  • [22]Buckley R. An ecological perspective of carrying capacity. Ann Tour Res 1999, 26(3):705-708.
  • [23]Roe D, Leader-Williams N, Dalal-Clayton B. Take Only Photograhs, Leave Only Footprints: The Environmental Impacts of Wildlife Tourism. London: International Institute for Environment and Development Wildlife Develop Ser, 1997.
  • [24]Namberger P, Jackisch S, Schmude J, Karl M. Overcrowding, Overtourism and Local Level Disturbance: How Much Can Munich Handle? Tour Plan Dev 2019, 16(4):452-472.
  • [25]Swarbrooke J. Sustainable Tourism Management. New York: CABI Publishing, USA, 1999.
  • [26]Chen CL, Teng N. Management priorities and carrying capacity at a high-rise beach from tourists’ perspectives: A way towards sustainable beach tourism. Mar Policy 2016, 74:213-219.
  • [27]Muler-Gonzalez V, Coromina L, Gali N. Overtourism: Residents’ perceptions of tourism impact as an indicator of resident social carrying capacity-case study of a Spanish heritage town. Tour Rev 2018, 73(3):277-296.
  • [28]Navarro E, Damian I, Ferna´ndez-Morales A. Carrying capacity model applied in coastal destinations. Ann Tour Res 2013, 43(10):1-19.
  • [29]Kyriakou K, Hativis GA, Kapsimahs V, Sourianos E, Vandarakis D. The application of GIS in tourism carrying capacity assessment for the island of Rhodes. In Paper and proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology (pp.210-216) 31st August -2nd September 2017, Rhodes, Greece.
  • [30]Hall CM. Policy, Power and Place. Chichester: John Wiley Tourism and Politics 1994.
  • [31]Wang JH, Wang E. An evaluation method of tourism carrying capacity based on visitor experience utility. Tourism Trib 2015, 30(4):105-106.
  • [32]Vishwambhar PS. Carrying capacity analysis and destination development: a case study of Gangotri tourists/pilgrims’ circuit in the Himalaya. Asia Pac J Tour Res 2018, 23(3):312-322.
  • [33]Rudsari SMM, Gharibi N. Host-guest attitudes toward socio-cultural carrying capacity of urban tourism in Chalus, Mazandaran. J Tour Hospital Res 2019, 6(2):31-37.
  • [34]Marsiglio S. On the carrying capacity and the optimal number of visitors in tourism destinations. Tour Rev 2017, 23(3):632-646.
  • [35]Lobo HAS. Tourist carrying capacity of Santana cave (PETAR-SP, Brazil): A new method based on a critical atmospheric parameter. Tour Manag Perspect 2015, 16(10):67-75.
  • [36]Wang J, Huang X, Gong Z, Gao K. Dynamic assessment of tourism carrying capacity and its impacts on tourism economic growth in urban tourism destinations in China. J Destin Mark Manag 2020, 15:1-15.
  • [37]Mrda A, Caric H, Scitaroci BBO. The importance of the concept of tourism carrying capacity for spatial planning: previous research, development and methodological approaches. Prostor 2014, 22(2):213-217.
  • [38]Hennink M, Hutter I, Bailey A. Qualitative Research Methods. London: Sage, 2011.
  • [39]Leitzmann MF. Physical Activity Recommendations and Decreased Risk of Mortality. Arch Intern Med 2007, 167(22):10/24.
  • [40]Johnston J, Newton J. Building Green. A Guide to Using Plants on Roofs, Walls and Pavements. London: The Mayor of London, 2004.
  • [41]Pinheiro F. Redesigning Historical Cities facing rapid tourism growth: the case of Macao’s World Heritage Center and Sand Ma Lou Avenue. Worldw Hosp Tour Themes 2017, 19(3):274- 288.
  • [42]Sa G C. Government Information Bureau. Macao Macau Magazine n.64, 2011.
  • [43]Siemens, AG. Asia Green City Index. Assessing the environmental performance of Asia’s major cities Singapore: Siemens 2011.
  • [44]UN-Habitat. State of the World’s Cities 2008/2009 United States: Harmonious Cities, 2009.
  • [45]Hoje Macau. March 20th Juristas da Assembleia Legislativa falam em violações à Lei Básica na lei do urbanismo, by Andreia Sofia Silva Retrieved 10th October 2019, 2013.
  • [46]Sinnet D. Making the Case for Investment in the Walking Environment, Living streets, 2011.